<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Distinct UX &#187; indesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tstiles.com/tag/indesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tstiles.com</link>
	<description>1. Distinguishable to the mind or eye as unique.  // 2. Presenting a clear unmistakable impression in user experience, interaction, and human centered design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wireframing in InDesign vs. Fireworks</title>
		<link>http://tstiles.com/2008/11/12/wireframing-in-indesign-vs-fireworks/</link>
		<comments>http://tstiles.com/2008/11/12/wireframing-in-indesign-vs-fireworks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tstiles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireframes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tstiles.com/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A solid review of the pros and cons to wireframing in InDesign versus Fireworks. NathanCurtis.com // InDesign vs. Fireworks CS3 Round 1 My Take on InDesign I have primarilly used InDesign for wireframing and have enjoyed the use of master templates, easy updating, styles, and auto updating of revised image files throughout the doc. My [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A solid review of the pros and cons to wireframing in InDesign versus Fireworks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nathancurtis.com/2008/04/21/indesign-cs3-vs-fireworks-cs3-round-1/">NathanCurtis.com // InDesign vs. Fireworks CS3 Round 1</a></p>
<h2>My Take on InDesign</h2>
<p>I have primarilly used InDesign for wireframing and have enjoyed the use of master templates, easy updating, styles, and auto updating of revised image files throughout the doc.</p>
<h2>My Take on Fireworks, TBD</h2>
<p>Heading into work with Flex and the possibility of simple prototypes is moving me currently towards Fireworks as a solution that encompasses master templates, pages, and the greater ability to output as a clickable prototype.</p>
<h4>The Verdict? &#8211; from Nathan Curtis&#8230;</h4>
<p><em>They are both good, very good. Choose a tool for wireframing depends on the specific organizational setting, preexisting tool proficiencies, need to also support visual design in the same tool, likelihood of heavy vs. light prototyping, and modularity.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tstiles.com/2008/11/12/wireframing-in-indesign-vs-fireworks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

